What is a good representitive

Posted by Administrator on Tuesday, December 31. 2019 at 16:08
In my opinion what is a proper representative of the people!

A representative is a person that should reflect and express the values of the people they represent, the thoughts and wishes of the majority if not all of those they are reasonable to within certain guidelines that are preset set by the majority through ratifying a constitution using ethical and moral guides in making certain determinations and decisions, and not the other way around by individuals, that is if there is to be a truly free society, if so that would indicate real equality for all who live under those rules, it should be the responsibility of others to make informed policy decisions and pass those thoughts on to their representative for ratification, of course that doesn't prohibit that representative from suggesting their own thoughts for consideration, but those suggestions are the people’s job first offered through a vote after debate. Unfortunately that is not always the case; so often those representatives selected by the people they serve are elected or appointed without the proper vetting creating chaos. Most individuals are so wrapped up in other details of their own life they often just pass on that responsibility of representing their interest to a certain body to others in hopes they are honorable and have everyone’s best interest in mind, but often they are not honorable allowing someone other person other than themselves to set standards for life contrary to set rules hoping their interest are safe guarded, and only relying on statements made by those individuals who make those statements that sound good to some, but often are not in the constituents best interest, and because of that we end up with a similar condition that existed when the king was over thrown in 1776 in one person rule. Although no one can guarantee a certain outcome when having to deal with others in making a proper case for ratification of any proposal presented, however there are steps to insure such ratification if properly argued. Keeping in mind a representative may not fulfill a promise they make for valid reasons in some cases, but failure comes by not preforming their duty when that person does not properly state to those they represent why they failed, so it may not always be their fault, however more times than not it’s due to weakness, corruption and insincerity. Weakness in not adhering to certain standards, corrupt by being beholding to special interests that do not have the whole at interest, insincerity knowing their allegiance is with an outside group and lying about their intent.

Now here comes the sticky part, and where complacency and corruption comes with some people elected to or appointed in some way to represent the entirety of those who are their constituents and in some way their responsible, also has certain rights, as a citizen themselves they have every right to express and offer their own opinions and give those opinions to those constituents for consideration just as anyone else has the right. However here is where those opinions take on a different completion, in order to represent everyone in their assigned district they need to set aside any partisan concerns and only make those decisions that are common sense and good for all. That is the duty and obligation expected for representation of all people and certainly a way of ending the deadlock seen so often in different settings by anyone

A, Choosing the proper representative to work on your behalf should begin with character of that individual which could indicate their truthfulness and sincerity and if they can be trusted.
B, Making sure of the clarity of conviction by that person, it also should be considered what they stand for, is it the same as you or are they wishy washy or can hold firm on a subject.
C, Past associations is an area that should be looked at and how well any questions can be answered regarding those associations if required, like going back and forth in membership with a specific party.

What should take center stage in any determination on what someone will do for you a specific party platform however could be important, but what is first and foremost are they true to their party or American’s first with everyone’s best interest as a concern. And further they should be immediately subject to recall if less than adequate performance is seen.

If there is anyone with a differing opinion please answer this post with that dissenting point of view.

[Edited for the purpose of correction and grammar on 1-9-2020]

Free speech under attack

Posted by Administrator on Sunday, December 22. 2019 at 14:35 in Opinion
One of the most basics of all rights guaranteed to citizens of the U S is free speech and that is under attack in many forms by some. It is the right of everyone to be heard regardless of what argument is being presented, being shouted down or hampered in presenting any proposal for consideration would be contrary to good behavior, but some with their words and actions hinder those rights of others, which for similar reasons could hinder their right of decent also, if all things are considered equal and where their rights could be interfered with too is un-American, bringing into focus the responsibility of all citizens to guard against such actions and fight both enemies foreign and domestic, underlining the word domestic.
First it has to be considered what is free speech? Being free to say what someone thinks is not the actual intent of free speech. Just because someone has that right to say something doesn’t mean everything said is worthwhile, the simple fact is somethings that should never be uttered such as lie’s and falsehoods are not acceptable if negative repercussions should not expected.
The actual purpose of Free speech was political speech, conceived in an effort to stifle tyranny or the possibility of that occurring, whereas, as before many people declared the right of free speech, a person that spoke out of turn could face losing their life, accomplishing freedom successfully would be allowing an individual to speck their mind then having a rebuttal of those statements if needed at a later date, which is known as parliamentary procedure a way of showing some intelligence by those speaking or listening then engaging in proper communications, in any case any rebuttal could be as soon as immediately after what is uttered or at some other point in time, that would be the only fair way for everyone to be heard, anything else could be seen as treasonous or illegal in some form in not allowing a person to exercise their rights of free people.

It also should be known, as a matter of fact, that without free speech many or all the other rights have no meaning or can’t exist, and without those rights freedom can’t be achieved for anyone.
As far as being believable in what is said, it all boils down to good character as everything is dependent on that. Take it from someone who has been misrepresented, lied about and cheated or abused in some form or another by ignorant and corrupt individuals for most of at least 50 years, giving me for more than ample experience to comment.

I hope individuals can understand the actual concept of free speech so they can imagine the value of that speech and comment which would be greatly appreciated as well as any dissenting views could be valuable!

Theory of unintented consequence or is it theory

Posted by Administrator on Tuesday, December 17. 2019 at 15:13 in General Discussion, The Internet
Theory of unintentional consequences or are they really unintentional!, maybe, or are they unforeseen or masked criminal acts. Criminal acts defined as causing harm to others besides oneself, acknowledgement is made that not always harm is purposeful. Of course many who engage in anything that produces unintended consequence may not always realize that is what they are doing at any particular time, but through ignorance of any outcome that may occur then that brings up a question of their competence in making any decision without fully understanding what outcome it may produce. But what if they are purposeful negligent acts, then they are criminal which doesn't paint a very rosy picture of our leaders. However it must be considered unless someone is totally ignorant there must be an intentional goal for any actions taken by them.

Though most conditions which may occur that would create any unintentional consequence comes from not totally understanding what is it that causes those consequences, so therefore it is extremely important to choose the right person who may offer any suggested changes or additions to present policy. Keeping in mind that the devil is in the details so to speak, so simplicity is important to avoid unintended consequences, which brings this conversation to its true point, simplicity and straight forward speech and honesty are always the best policy. Policies that should be applied to present day events of all kinds.

Anyone who has a contrary thought or belief on anything said here, please comment below and make your valid argument showing way this is a false statement or stance or voice your support and join the millions who argee.

Further Deminstration of How Ignorant and Corrupt Some can be

Posted by Administrator on Saturday, December 7. 2019 at 19:04 in Opinion
A further demonstration of how ignorant some individuals are is by engaging in certain acts, and many of those people continue with trying to paint or draw an incorrect picture on certain issues making it obvious they are the true obstructer or at least malfeasance in office. Take people like Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and others who share either the same or similar points of view. It’s not so much being correct or not which they are not, but being ignorant. Since I am sure that in their minds they think they are correct but if they aren't then that further demonstrates some kind of corruption. If they wish to be sure of what they say and think, then asking proper questions of those they differ with and getting a clear honest response not just assuming that would be proper, If that is not accomplished correctly then there can only be corruption or at least misunderstanding. If there is corruption I wonder who if anyone is paying them to partake in this activity or offering some other gratuity to continue on the path they find themselves on.
But do consider just one thing if nothing else, activity that points to some kind of corruption or complete stupidity of some individuals by referring one of many comments made by Speaker Pelosi and others that was off color where there is one example when she said the “ if you want to know what’s in it” comment, well if you have to pass it to know what’s in it then that indicates either she does not know how to explain it correctly herself and fails to know what’s in it there is something knowingly being hidden from those who should be made aware of certain facts before they except or agree to them or both, in either case there is good reason not to trust that person making those kind of statements in the first place, she obviously is not qualified to hold such a position that puts everyone at risk or representing anyone. Just because someone seems likable in many ways is not a good reason to support that person with your life, family or livelihood when the end result is they could control your fate, I think that is a grave mistake many make all to often.

This impeachment garbage is clear that it is only for reasons of a difference of opinion or perhaps disclosing certain individuals ill-gotten gains are threated and could be exposed for what they are by President Trump if he continues, certain individuals know if he is allowed to continue or anyone like him for that matter exposer is emanate , but the fact is that if the tables were turned the complainers would be in the crosshairs themselves for doing much the same thing or worse that’s been pointed out by some already, those individuals are engaged in the same or worse behavior they are claiming justifying their purpose of the these proceedings of impeachment against President Trump, these people are fools or idiots anyway by thier actions.
In truth even if it may seem harsh, more people should not be afraid to speak their minds and peacefully call things for what they are like President Trump does.

. As usual if anyone can show me where I am wrong and possess differing opinions and why I need to change my thinking, your input would be valued. But remember the question is what kind of life do you want?

Request Registration

Here you can register yourself as an author for this blog. Just enter your data, submit the form and receive further instructions via email.


Simple questions regarding Life Style Are
Do you wish other to run your life
Do you wish to be free keeping within the law


Authers Login

Blog Administration


Powered by

Serendipity PHP Weblog