Theory of unintented consequence or is it theory

Posted by Administrator on Tuesday, December 17. 2019 at 15:13 in General Discussion, The Internet
Theory of unintentional consequences or are they really unintentional!, maybe, or are they unforeseen or masked criminal acts. Criminal acts defined as causing harm to others besides oneself, acknowledgement is made that not always harm is purposeful. Of course many who engage in anything that produces unintended consequence may not always realize that is what they are doing at any particular time, but through ignorance of any outcome that may occur then that brings up a question of their competence in making any decision without fully understanding what outcome it may produce. But what if they are purposeful negligent acts, then they are criminal which doesn't paint a very rosy picture of our leaders. However it must be considered unless someone is totally ignorant there must be an intentional goal for any actions taken by them.

Though most conditions which may occur that would create any unintentional consequence comes from not totally understanding what is it that causes those consequences, so therefore it is extremely important to choose the right person who may offer any suggested changes or additions to present policy. Keeping in mind that the devil is in the details so to speak, so simplicity is important to avoid unintended consequences, which brings this conversation to its true point, simplicity and straight forward speech and honesty are always the best policy. Policies that should be applied to present day events of all kinds.

Anyone who has a contrary thought or belief on anything said here, please comment below and make your valid argument showing way this is a false statement or stance or voice your support and join the millions who argee.

Many ongoing ICANN Failures

Posted by Administrator on Monday, August 19. 2019 at 18:09 in General Discussion, The Internet
ICANN
International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers



Why should ICANN be the center of all the controversy in reference to internet activities, because they have control over its direction through policy making and other aspects of internet operations, that responsibility given them by the FCC to aid with thier responsabilies of oversight!
ICANN was considered by some in the past as an answer to many questions that prevailed for the oversight of an up and coming industry, where in fact, it has become a method of restricting individual rights and policing criminal activity through making certain policies which was never their purview in any case. That function should be left up to law enforcement.
In its initial day ICANN was conceived as an aid to a Federal agency the FCC, in managing certain aspects of the internet which at that time and still is a media and method of communications for all, and in that communications may will and does affect how that media is used by anyone.
ICCAN having Its main function to help all users of the internet by creating an orderly framework for its use and allowing for a good experience to be had by all who may use the internet, not just a few, however ICANN has failed in that task in many ways.
ICANN has gone far beyond its mandate by violating numerous State and Federal Statutes which by violating those laws and guidelines set by statute has enabled many to abuse and use that medium for nefarious and criminal activities.
One of those areas privacy, where in an effort to somehow protect individuals privacy, ICANN has violated some if not all individuals’ privacy they seek by causing the publishing of certain information on individuals.
It is illegal under some shine the light laws in many States to cause any publication of certain information regarding an individual without their consent, which they haven’t properly received.

ICANN enlists various associates and affiliates to carry out a number of policies ICANN has establishes for the use of the internet, then in many cases has failed to ensure the proper use of those policies. And by that failure fails in its proper oversight function of the very task it has been given by the FCC, and that task is to insure an orderly method of use of the internet.

Criminal activity by ICANN!

There are certain passages within ICANN’s own policy manual prohibiting criminal activity, but by aiding and abetting any criminal activity through certain acts by them and thier associates, they have allowed themselves to become a part of those activities of criminal behavior.

It has been found that certain associates acting in ICANN’s name interfered with the legal actions of an internet user, citizen, who that user had paid for that privilege of its use in a number of ways, and further that associate apparently using an ICANN policy as the premise for its action proceeded to damage that user, and where ICANN was notified and asked to clarify its position in ample time prior to any injury occurring, failed to intercede in that effort to verify such information as being accurate or not, in any case, to insure proper use of one of its policies, then by not reacting caused great irreparable harm to a citizen of the U. S. in prohibiting that individual to exercise many of its legal rights.

Under present policy that action could happen to anyone at any time if not checked. This act by ICANN is even contrary to the “none delegation theory” set by congress, and by not acting when it could ICCAN has at least committed a form of Malfeasance.
Further it has to be noted, ICANN not being a law making or enforcement body or agency, ICANN does not have the legal right to prohibit any person’s legal activities, and until such time all people who vote and can make such a decision giving such authority to those who represent the proper body the actions of ICCAN and others or illegal and Un-constitutional, I say it again ICANN doesn’t have the authority to stifle the people’s rights, that includes any person anywhere since they are international in scope.

If ICANN would concentrate more on an effort to correct and eliminate actual fraud through false adverting and actual scams being perpetrated and less on things that have little or no bearing on protecting individuals they would be better served, and those acts concentrated on would included better communications and responsiveness. They should look more into the activities of some like Facebook, Mylife and others like them who are engaged in many of the present day ills, those ills that have an effect on everyone may be solved.

There still has to be a question asked of everyone, How do you wish to live and be treated, with respect and a secure future and knowing your legal efforts or protected or not?
As usual any legitimate dissenting views are welcome as well as those views supporting these matter.

CCOUA Admin
P O Box 1791
Maricopa, AZ 85138

Internet Privacy Concerns

Posted by Administrator on Tuesday, July 23. 2019 at 18:04 in General Discussion, The Internet
Internet concerns on posting personal information

With this new day of reliance on the internet to gather information, which may affect others in some way, it is incumbent on those who publish this and any such information, to be accurate and remain in the confines of the law, and the bounds of common sense, that is, if they wish to engage in this type of behavior in any case. It has been found and noted that much of the information being posted by some such Sites like "Mylife" for example, in many ways reflects the background and character of others being scrutinized, where much or a great deal of this information shown, is either false, misleading or an outright fabrication, and does not indicate what may be the true nature of an individual being researched for any purpose, and for any and many reasons they may have or think they have. In the case of employment for example, that information being sought for that purpose, may at some point keeping an individual from much needed employment without regard to that information is correct or not, where if the use of other means are used explicitly and properly, and insure that information and it's use for that purpose is correct, it may prove more beneficial to the person seeking such information.
Much of this published information, goes un-known to the subject person, or even being stated or shown in some venue which others are privy to that information, not giving the subject person to even have a fair opportunity to explain or counter that information, or if that information is either clear, correct and accurate. Oh sure they say they have a way to allow editing, but a person has to be aware it’s there first, however it shouldn't be there to start with. Once it is made known if it is, it may be too late to establish its authenticity or correctness and countering any attitude derived from It, which may have already been drawn from its influence. Remember we also live in an age of hacking and identity theft which is prevalent, and there is no way of being sure if that person may be a victim of such activity, or a malicious attempt at person destruction, until after it's learned and it may at that time too late to successfully correct any issue it may have created, if it does exist.

Be Warry of Terms of Service

Posted by Administrator on Thursday, September 13. 2018 at 15:43 in General Discussion, The Internet
Be warry of any Terms of Service which in most cases are designed to take away or interfere with the guaranteed rights of any user and citizen of the U S or any juridical area of operation of that service.
It is a known fact that if an individual or organization is offering the public any kind of service or product they are the ones that are and should be beholding in some way to their customers not vice versa, If any terms of service shall exist at all they should only be, that which is not beyond any specific requirement which would normal and is expected for that service such as medical privacy, and only the promise to adhere to that which is legal behavior on both the customer and provider of that product or service and nothing else other than perhaps a statement limiting the service area involved.

Any company, firm, individual or organization that presences any terms other than those simple suggestions offered or indicated above does not deserve any patronage by anyone. Organizations that offer any expanded terms of service which can be found in ever increasing numbers lacks any desire to be of any kind of service to the general or specific person.

Any comments or dissenting views in the spirit of debate are welcome

Request Registration

Here you can register yourself as an author for this blog. Just enter your data, submit the form and receive further instructions via email.




Polls

Simple questions regarding Life Style Are
Do you wish other to run your life
Do you wish to be free keeping within the law

Archives

Authers Login

Blog Administration

Calendar

Powered by

Serendipity PHP Weblog